audio | interview with probably not a vampire

[omniavincit]

[ William jumps right in—unless they're brand new, most inmates should know his voice. It belongs to the guy who stays with them in the dorms and is usually out of bed before six in the morning. Maybe you recently heard it raised at Travis outside the commissary! ]

I spoke to the Navarch, and while it's almost unheard of for her to correspond with inmates, she's agreed to take questions on your behalf. I'll be sitting down with her and broadcasting the interview to the network.

For privacy and ease of organization [ and to minimize network arguments ] please message me directly with whatever you'd like asked. It can be anything, but I'd prefer it be interesting. If I have a problem with it I'll let you know.

[ This is not a threat, but it is wry. ]


[ WARDEN FILTER ]

We should pool our tickets.



[ ooc: TO AVOID A MILLION INBOX THREADS, just reply here with "private" in the subject line if you're sending William a question! Or ignore him and discuss shit publicly, I'm not the police. ]

Comments

[counterstep]

i didn't
that you assumed it tells me plenty about what you think of perspective, though

are people not allowed to wonder?
or question even after being told otherwise?

[dealwiththe]

Actually, I think we may both be jumping to some conclusions here, so let me try to clarify *my* perspective.

Most of my existence, I have dealt with people who assume I have bad intentions, nefarious designs, ulterior motives, etc. So yes, when you say “gathering intel”, “ulterior motives” and “other agendas”, those words mean that to me.

Which is why I prefer the words “listening to and learning from each other”. Does that help? As I said, and continue to say, I am more than happy to hear *your* perspective, so we can avoid this miscommunication in the future.